Retired Army Gen. Mark Milley, former chair of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, has recently sparked headlines by passionately defending the role of women in combat. His comments directly challenge critics, including those associated with former President Donald Trump, and underscore the military’s commitment to equality and meritocracy.
Milley’s remarks, delivered during a national security event hosted by the Pallas Foundation, highlight both historical contributions of women in combat and his vision for a standards-based military. Let’s dive deeper into Milley’s statements, the ongoing debate surrounding women in combat roles, and the implications for the future of the U.S. military.
Mark Milley’s Powerful Defense of Women in Combat
During his speech, Milley drew on historical examples to emphasize the indispensable role women have played in combat situations. He recounted the bravery of an Army nurse who traversed a minefield to save wounded soldiers, only to lose her life in the process.
“Don’t lecture me about women in combat,” Milley said passionately. “Women have been in combat, and it doesn’t matter if that 7.62 [caliber round] hits you in the chest. No one gives a shit if it’s a woman or a guy to pull that trigger, you’re still dead.”
This blunt yet poignant statement underscores Milley’s firm belief in the capabilities and valor of women who have served on the front lines, dispelling myths that gender diminishes their contributions.
Controversy with Trump’s Pentagon Nominee
Milley’s comments come in the wake of contentious remarks made by Pete Hegseth, a Fox News host and Trump’s nominee for Defense Secretary. Hegseth argued against women serving in combat roles, stating that their inclusion has complicated battlefield operations. He further suggested that women could contribute to the military in other capacities, but not in armor, artillery, infantry, or special operations.
This perspective stands in stark contrast to Milley’s viewpoint, which is firmly rooted in meritocracy. “If you meet the standards, our military must be, and always should be, a standards-based, merit-based military. Period. Full stop,” Milley declared.
A Historical Shift: Women in Combat Roles
The U.S. military formally allowed women to serve in combat roles in 2015 under then-Defense Secretary Ashton Carter’s directive. This policy opened all military positions, including those in traditionally male-dominated fields such as infantry and special operations, to women who met rigorous physical and mental standards.
Critics like Hegseth claim that integrating women into combat roles has presented challenges. However, proponents, including Defense Secretary Lloyd Austin, argue that women bring invaluable skills and perspectives to the military. “Our women add significant value to the United States military, and we should never change that,” Austin said during a recent briefing.
Milley’s Legacy and Criticism of Trump
Milley, who served as the nation’s top military officer under both Trump and President Joe Biden until his retirement in 2023, has been outspoken about his disagreements with Trump’s policies and rhetoric. In journalist Bob Woodward’s book, Milley referred to Trump as “fascist to the core.”
The retired general’s recent remarks reflect his continued commitment to a military grounded in merit rather than political ideologies. By standing up for the inclusion of women in combat, Milley not only defends military standards but also counters narratives that could undermine its unity and strength.
The Broader Implications for U.S. Military Policy
The debate surrounding women in combat roles is part of a larger conversation about the direction of the U.S. military. Trump’s often critical stance on “woke generals” and his questioning of longstanding alliances like NATO have raised concerns about the military’s future under his influence.
Milley predicts a gradual “retraction” of U.S. military forces abroad but stops short of labeling it isolationism. This potential shift could impact international alliances and the military’s global presence, though the specifics remain unclear.
FAQs about Women in Combat and Milley’s Remarks
1. What prompted Gen. Milley to defend women in combat?
Milley’s defense was sparked by recent criticisms, particularly from Pete Hegseth, who argued that women should not serve in frontline combat roles. Milley countered by highlighting historical examples of women’s bravery and reaffirming the military’s merit-based standards.
2. When were women allowed to serve in combat roles?
Women were officially allowed to serve in combat roles in 2015, following a directive by then-Defense Secretary Ashton Carter. This policy enabled women to take on roles in infantry, artillery, and special operations if they met the required standards.
3. What are the main criticisms of women in combat roles?
Critics argue that the inclusion of women in combat units complicates battlefield operations and may impact unit cohesion. Proponents counter that these challenges can be addressed through rigorous training and leadership.
4. How has Milley responded to Trump’s military policies?
Milley has been critical of Trump’s rhetoric and policies, particularly those that undermine military unity or alliances. He has emphasized the importance of maintaining a standards-based, apolitical military.
5. What is the future of women in the U.S. military?
The inclusion of women in combat roles is likely to continue, with leaders like Milley and Austin advocating for their contributions. As long as individuals meet the required standards, the military will prioritize capability over gender.